The fact that it has become impossible to procure a cargo （），as a rule，relieve the Charterer of liability.

The consignee’s refusal to take delivery，or failure to do so within a reasonable time，also puts an end to（）liability as a carrier.

Unless otherwise agreed，（）must take the goods from alongside，though this obligation may be varied by a custom of the port which is not inconsistent with the express terms of the contract.

The master’s authority to act in the interests of the cargo owner is part of his general authorityas servant of the Shipowner，and therefore（）will be liable if the master abuses his powers.

We must take the Charterer’s benefit（）full consideration．

If the Shipowner makes an innocent misrepresentation which induces the Charterer to sign the contract，the Charterer may be entitled to（）the charter-party.

The cargo must be loaded within the time stipulated by the charter-party，otherwise the Charterer will have to pay（）.

If the vessel is not discharged in the time stipulated in the charter-party，the Charterer renders（）liable to pay demurrage or damages for detention，as the case may be.

The importance of the distinction between a charter by demise and a charter party proper（）that under the former the master is the agent of the Charterer，not of the Shipowner.

If the Charterer sends a vessel to an unsafe port，and she is damaged as a result，he will have to indemnify the（）.